My new article, “Rental Housing Spot Markets: How Online Information Exchanges Can Supplement Transacted-Rents Data,” with Jake Wegmann and Junfeng Jiao is now published in the Journal of Planning Education and Research (download free PDF).
How much does it cost to rent a typical apartment in your city? Answering this basic housing question can be surprisingly difficult. Consider the case of San Francisco in early 2018.
My article “Housing Search in the Age of Big Data: Smarter Cities or the Same Old Blind Spots?” with Max Besbris, Ariela Schachter, and John Kuk is now published in Housing Policy Debate. We look at the quantity and quality of information in online housing listings and find that they are much higher in White and non-poor neighborhoods than they are in poor, Black, or Latino neighborhoods. Listings in White neighborhoods include more descriptive text and focus on unit and neighborhood amenities, while listings in Black neighborhoods focus more on applicant (dis)qualifications. We discuss what this means for housing markets, filter bubbles, residential sorting and segregation, and housing policy. You can download a free PDF.
Housing search technologies are changing and, as a result, so are housing search behaviors. The most recent American Housing Survey revealed that, for the first time, more urban renters found their current homes through online technology platforms than any other information channel. These technology platforms collect and disseminate user-generated content and construct a virtual agora for users to share information with one another. Because they can provide real-time data about various urban phenomena, housing technology platforms are a key component of the smart cities paradigm.
This paradigm promotes information technology as both a technocratic mode of monitoring cities and a utopian mode of improving urban life through big data. In this context, “big data” typically refers to massive streams of user-generated content resulting from millions or billions of decentralized human actions. Data exhaust from Craigslist and other housing technology platforms offers a good example: optimistically, large corpora of rental listings could provide housing researchers and practitioners with actionable insights for policymaking while also equalizing access to information for otherwise disadvantaged homeseekers. But how good are these platforms at resolving the types of problems that already plague old-fashioned, non-big data? Does this broadcasting of information reduce longstanding geographic and demographic inequalities or do established patterns of segmentation and sorting remain?
I am presenting my ongoing research into the recent evolution of American street network planning and design at the annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board in Washington DC on January 13. This presentation asks the question: how has street network design changed over time, especially in recent years? I analyze the street networks of every US census tract and estimate each’s vintage.
Street network designs grew more disconnected, coarse-grained, and circuitous over the 20th century… but the 21st century has witnessed a promising rebound back toward more traditional, dense, and interconnected grids. Higher griddedness is associated with less car ownership, even when controlling for related socioeconomic, topographical, and other urban factors.
Update: the paper has been published in JAPA.
My new article “Spatial Information and the Legibility of Urban Form: Big Data in Urban Morphology” has been published in the International Journal of Information Management (download free PDF). It builds on recent work by Crooks et al, presenting workflows to integrate data-driven and narrative approaches to urban morphology in today’s era of ubiquitous urban big data. It situates this theoretically in the visual culture of planning to present a visualization-mediated interpretative process of data-driven urban morphology, focusing on transportation infrastructure via OSMnx.
I’m a co-author on a new article out in Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science titled “A Roundtable Discussion: Defining Urban Data Science” (download free PDF). It arises from a panel discussion I participated in at the 2019 AAG Annual Meeting in DC. Vanessa Frias-Martinez, Song Gao, Ate Poorthuis, and Wenfei Xu joined me on the panel, which was organized and moderated by Wei Kang, Taylor Oshan, and Levi Wolf. From the abstract:
My new article, Urban Spatial Order: Street Network Orientation, Configuration, and Entropy, has just been published in one of my favorite journals: Applied Network Science (download free PDF). This study explores the spatial signatures of urban evolution and central planning. It examines street network orientation, connectivity, granularity, and entropy in 100 cities around the world using OpenStreetMap data and OSMnx for modeling and visualization:
So, who’s got a grid and who doesn’t? Each of the cities above is represented by a polar histogram (aka rose diagram) depicting how its streets orient. Each bar’s direction represents the compass bearings of the streets (in that histogram bin) and its length represents the relative frequency of streets with those bearings. The cities above are in alphabetical order. Here they are again, re-sorted from most-ordered/gridded city (Chicago) to most-disordered (Charlotte):
My article, Online Rental Housing Market Representation and the Digital Reproduction of Urban Inequality, has just been published in Environment and Planning AÂ (download free PDF). It explores the representation of different communities in online rental listings from two perspectives: 1) how might biases in representativeness impact housing planners’ knowledge of rental markets, and 2) how might information inequality impact residential mobility, community legibility, gentrification, and housing voucher utilization?
I recently teamed up with an international group of public health researchers and spatial analysts to co-author an article, An Introduction to Software Tools, Data, and Services for Geospatial Analysis of Stroke Services, that has been accepted for publication at Frontiers in Neurology (download free PDF).
I am giving the Transactions in GIS plenary address at the AAG conference this afternoon. I’ll be reflecting on urban science, spatial networks, and tool-building in academia, focusing on OSMnx. A paper will be forthcoming soon, but in the meantime, for any interested plenary session attendees or other folks, here are a few links to more info and related resources:
What is OSMnx? What does it do? Here’s a succinct overview.
The easiest way to get started with street network modeling and analysis in OSMnx is with this docker image and these example/tutorial Jupyter notebooks. The OSMnx software documentation is available here and this journal article introduces it more formally.
My new article, “Street Network Models and Measures for Every U.S. City, County, Urbanized Area, Census Tract, and Zillow-Defined Neighborhood” has been published in Urban Science. This paper reports results from a broader project that collected raw street network data from OpenStreetMap using the Python-based OSMnx software for every U.S. city and town, county, urbanized area, census tract, and Zillow-defined neighborhood boundary. It constructed nonplanar directed multigraphs for each and analyzed their structural and morphological characteristics.
The resulting public data repository contains over 110,000 processed, cleaned street network graphs (which in turn comprise over 55 million nodes and over 137 million edges) at various scales—comprehensively covering the entire U.S.—archived as reusable open-source GraphML files, node/edge lists, and ESRI shapefiles that can be immediately loaded and analyzed in standard tools such as ArcGIS, QGIS, NetworkX, graph-tool, igraph, or Gephi.