My new article, “Rental Housing Spot Markets: How Online Information Exchanges Can Supplement Transacted-Rents Data,” with Jake Wegmann and Junfeng Jiao is now published in the Journal of Planning Education and Research (download free PDF).
How much does it cost to rent a typical apartment in your city? Answering this basic housing question can be surprisingly difficult. Consider the case of San Francisco in early 2018.
I am presenting my ongoing research into the recent evolution of American street network planning and design at the annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board in Washington DC on January 13. This presentation asks the question: how has street network design changed over time, especially in recent years? I analyze the street networks of every US census tract and estimate each’s vintage.
Street network designs grew more disconnected, coarse-grained, and circuitous over the 20th century… but the 21st century has witnessed a promising rebound back toward more traditional, dense, and interconnected grids. Higher griddedness is associated with less car ownership, even when controlling for related socioeconomic, topographical, and other urban factors.
Update: the paper has been published in JAPA.
My article, Online Rental Housing Market Representation and the Digital Reproduction of Urban Inequality, has just been published in Environment and Planning A (download free PDF). It explores the representation of different communities in online rental listings from two perspectives: 1) how might biases in representativeness impact housing planners’ knowledge of rental markets, and 2) how might information inequality impact residential mobility, community legibility, gentrification, and housing voucher utilization?
My chapter The Morphology and Circuity of Walkable and Drivable Street Networks is now in-press for publication in the forthcoming book The Mathematics of Urban Morphology (download free PDF). The book integrates recent theoretical and empirical work from urban planning, geography, sociology, architecture, economics, and mathematics around the theme of how we model and understand the urban form’s physical patterns and shaping processes. Fellow authors in this volume include Michael Batty, Diane Davis, Keith Clarke, Bin Jiang, Kay Axhausen, Carlo Ratti, and Stephen Marshall. The book itself can be purchased here.
My article, “Planarity and Street Network Representation in Urban Form Analysis,” was recently published in Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. Models of street networks underlie research in urban travel behavior, accessibility, design patterns, and morphology. These models are commonly defined as planar, meaning they can be represented in two dimensions without any underpasses or overpasses. However, real-world urban street networks exist in three-dimensional space and frequently feature grade separation such as bridges and tunnels: planar simplifications can be useful but they also impact the results of real-world street network analysis. This study measures the nonplanarity of drivable and walkable street networks in the centers of 50 cities worldwide, then examines the variation of nonplanarity across a single city. While some street networks are approximately planar, I empirically quantify how planar models can inconsistently but drastically misrepresent intersection density, street lengths, routing, and connectivity.
My article, “A Multi-Scale Analysis of 27,000 Urban Street Networks: Every US City, Town, Urbanized Area, and Zillow Neighborhood,” was recently published in Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. This study uses OSMnx to download and analyze 27,000 street networks from OpenStreetMap at metropolitan, municipal, and neighborhood scales – namely, every US city and town, census urbanized area, and Zillow-defined neighborhood. It illustrates the use of OSMnx and OpenStreetMap to consistently conduct street network analysis with extremely large sample sizes, with clearly defined network definitions and extents for reproducibility, and using nonplanar, directed graphs.
These 27,000 street networks as well as their measures have been shared in a free public repository at the Harvard Dataverse for anyone to re-purpose. This study’s empirical findings emphasize measures relevant to graph theory, transportation, urban design, and morphology, such as structure, connectedness, density, centrality, and resilience. It uses graph Maximum Betweenness Centrality and Average Node Connectivity to examine how “resilient” a street network is, in terms of how reliant it is on important nodes and how easy it is to disconnect it.
This post is adapted from this research paper that you can read/cite for more info. It analyzes and visualizes 100 cities around the world.
By popular request, this is a quick follow-up to this post comparing the orientation of streets in 25 US cities using Python and OSMnx. Here are 25 more cities around the world:
This post is adapted from this research paper that you can read/cite for more info. It analyzes and visualizes 100 cities around the world.
“We say the cows laid out Boston. Well, there are worse surveyors.” –Ralph Waldo Emerson. In 1960, one hundred years after Emerson’s quote, Kevin Lynch published The Image of the City, his treatise on the legibility of urban patterns. How coherent is a city’s spatial organization? How do these patterns help or hinder urban navigation? I recently wrote about visualizing street orientations with Python and OSMnx. That is, how is a city’s street network oriented in terms of the streets’ compass bearings? How well does it adhere to a straightforward north-south-east-west layout? I wanted to revisit this by comparing 25 major US cities’ orientations (EDIT: by popular request, see also this follow-up comparing world cities):
My short article “Estimating Local Daytime Population Density from Census and Payroll Data” is out now in the latest issue of Regional Studies, Regional Science. I discuss a method for estimating local daytime density across a metropolitan area using US Census and LEHD LODES data, and dig into some limitations and biases. I look at the San Francisco Bay Area as a case study:
Check out the journal article about this project.
I was recently asked: “how might someone figure out the local daytime population density across the Bay Area from public data?” My answer, in short, was that you really couldn’t accurately. But you could at least produce a coarse, biased estimate. Here’s how.
I examined the Bay Area’s tract-level daytime population density using three input data products: the 2010 TIGER/Line census tracts shapefile with DP1 attributes, the 2010 California LEHD LODES data, and the census bureau’s 2010 US states shapefile. I preferred the 2010 census demographic data to (more recent) ACS data because the ACS tract-level variables are five-year rolling averages. Given this, I preferred not to compare 2014 LODES data to 2010-2014 ACS data as the Bay Area experienced substantial housing, economic, and demographic upheaval over this interval – patterns obscured in the ACS rolling average. To avoid inconsistent comparison, I opted for more stale – but more accurate and comparable – data.