This post is adapted from an article I wrote in Progressive Planning.
Does food matter in neighborhood design? Should it? The answers to these questions are complicated and obscured by decades of perplexing policy and practice. There are many benefits of good food – that is, food which is healthy, affordable, fair, and sustainable. Proper nourishment has been linked in several studies to better classroom performance. Walkable access to healthy food can reduce America’s growing obesity and diabetes epidemics. Locally-sourced food can reinforce better dietary habits as consumers connect with the value chain and see eating as a more natural process.
The benefits are straightforward, but do most American neighborhoods actually support healthy food access?
Continue reading How Our Neighborhoods Lost Local Food (And How They Can Get It Back)
The Department of City and Regional Planning at UC Berkeley has a rather arduous process for advancing to candidacy in the PhD program. It essentially consists of 6 parts:
- Take all the required courses
- Produce an inside field statement – a sort of literature review and synthesis explaining the niche within urban planning in which you will be positioning your dissertation research
- Complete an outside field – sort of like what a minor was in college
- Take an inside field written exam
- Produce a defensible dissertation prospectus
- Take an oral comprehensive exam covering your inside field, your outside field, general planning theory and history, and finally presenting your prospectus.
Whew. Lots to do this year. The good news is I am currently wrapping up my inside field statement and preparing to take the inside field exam. My topic is generally around complexity theory in urban planning. Here is the working abstract from my statement:
Continue reading Urban Complexity and the March Toward Qualifying Exams